Yes, that’s right: one of my oldest blog entries (and a personal favorite of mine) is back, this time in the form of a video!
Check it out below…
Yes, that’s right: one of my oldest blog entries (and a personal favorite of mine) is back, this time in the form of a video!
Check it out below…
Debaters needing to add that extra little oomph to their presentations now have an additional tool at their disposal, thanks to a decision by the International Committee on Rhetorical Standards. They can always burst into tears.
The prolapsis ad lacrimas maneuver permits debaters to have a deeply emotional outburst near the end of the debating period, augmenting their argument by portraying their opponents as cruel and unreasoning monsters.
Long considered as a questionable if highly effective rhetorical device rather than a line of serious philosophical inquiry, the maneuver was approved in the proceedings of the Committee’s 82nd quadrennial conference as a legitimate method of reaching truth and general understanding.
“This is genuinely exciting,” said Professor Ernst Heltvildt of the College of Experimental Epistemology, who sponsored the resolution. “It’s the first new logical approach we’ve endorsed in decades. It’s vital for debaters to have this important tool in the new age of Emotional Intelligence.”
In the final debate on the resolution, opponents pointed out that prolapsis ad lacrimas is a close cousin (and frequent associate) of the ad hominem fallacy, which transforms debate about an issue into a debate about the debaters. “Surely this is just legitimizing the playing of the ‘victim’ card,” said Dr. Dee Vernunft of the University of Pomme de Terre’s Advanced Philosophy faculty in closing arguments on the matter. “Making your opponent look bad may change the flavor of the debate, but it doesn’t change the facts presented. Endorsing the prolapsis ad lacrimas will reduce the search for truth to a question of who can throw the biggest hissy fit.”
The record of the debate then indicates that Prof. Heltvildt, who was arguing in support of the resolution, then burst into tears, explained how close to his heart the resolution was, and accused his opponent of “heartlessly perpetuating a strictly rational outlook with an irrational hatred of emotional influences.”
The resolution then passed by a 10-to-1 margin.
The move to adopt an emotional outburst as a legitimate tool of logical analysis has attracted some comment in epistemological circles. “The relationship between emotion and logic has always been rather tenuous,” said Professor Mitt Kopfschmerzen of the University of Punxsutawney’s College of Applied Philosophy. “While emotion can sometimes provide important insights on issues, it has certain limits as an analytical tool. These days we seem to be observing a growing distrust of logic as such, and a growing emphasis on ’emotional truth,’ which seems to be interpreted in different ways. Do they mean a) facts about one’s emotional state at a particular time or b) things that one believes to be true because one feels strongly about them?
“There’s a vast difference between the statements ‘It is true that I feel very strongly about this’ and ‘This must be true because I feel it to be’–or, for that matter, ‘You should be convinced of my opinion simply because I feel so strongly about it.’ I fear adopting the prolapsis ad lacrimas will only confuse the matter further.”
In other news, shares of companies that manufacture facial tissues and eye drops surged in late trading for no obvious reason.
Oxford, England–Jubilant mobs streamed out of the Sheldonian Theatre this evening following an upset victory by the Buckingham debate team over the York team in this year’s annual debate finals.
Thames Valley Police forces were called out to help quell rioting in Broad Street and looting in the historic Covered Market as supporters of Team Buckingham celebrated this important win.
“This hooliganism is absolutely unwarranted,” police spokesman Inspector Robert Fuzz told the local newspaper. “I don’t care if their team proved conclusively that the Princes in the Tower were murdered by the Duke of Buckingham; that doesn’t give them the right to go around smashing property.”
Team York, which in past years has often successfully argued for the guilt of Richard III in connection with the disappearance of the Princes, was widely considered the favorite in this contest, having easily knocked out Team Tyrrell in the semi-finals. The Buckingham team only reached the finals after narrowly defeating Team Tudor in double overtime.
The finals match included a number of tense moments. At one point a member of Team Buckingham was ejected over a vicious ad hominem argument against the leader of Team York. Then, in the final moments of the game, Team York failed to intercept a desperate reductio ad absurdum argument lobbed by Team Buckingham, allowing the latter to score and win the match.
Inspector Fuzz cited the dramatic finale as a contributing factor to the rioting. “While the spectacular ending to the game certainly left the fans in an excited state,” he said, “it is in fact possible to be excited without wreaking havoc on your host city.”
According to Inspector Fuzz, the police are deploying standard crowd-control measures, such as tear gas, water cannons, and a series of public-address systems broadcasting lengthy lectures on modern macroeconomic theory.
Estimates of the damage have yet to be compiled, pending review by insurance adjusters.
Representatives of Team Buckingham issued a statement expressing dismay over the rioting as well as a ten-minute argument for why it wasn’t their fault.
Organizers of the annual debate over the fate of the princes say that they will investigate ways of reducing potential violence ahead of next year’s contest, possibly including a moratorium on dramatic finishes.
If you liked this story, you might also like:
Mathematician’s Work Rediscovered in Remote Scottish Ruins
La Satira News Service
Researchers with the University of Punxsutawney’s College of Mathematical Archaeology announced the discovery of a site that sheds new insight into a lost golden age of Scottish mathematical studies.
Professors Abner “Ab” Bacchus and Adam McAdam announced the new findings on New Year’s Eve, the anniversary of the site’s discovery.
The discovery was initially made by accident after a fishing expedition encountered a storm and was forced ashore at the mouth of the Syne River, on the western coast of Scotland. There, members of the expedition discovered the ruins of a village that had been buried under water and sand for more than three hundred years.
Initial investigations proved to be inconclusive, with speculation ranging from an ancient settlement by the Beaker people to the secret post-Culloden hideout of Bonnie Prince Charlie. The only distinctive clues were unusual quantities of pens, parchment, and abacuses, as well as a primitive calculating instrument called Napier’s bones.
“Clearly this wasn’t your typical fishing village,” said Professor Bacchus in his presentation on the discovery.
The investigation had a breakthrough when archaeologists discovered a wall safe containing a small number of written records that miraculously survived the inundation. The records pointed to the activity of Alda Quaintans, a mathematical professor of the medieval University of Mull, who envisioned Scotland as becoming a scientific powerhouse. Professor Quaintans proposed a colony of researchers to promote the practical application of science and math, as well as to compete with the work of Sir Isaac Newton in England. (The emphasis on practical application seems to have been to differentiate the new institution from his own university, which was mainly dedicated–as one might perhaps expect–to purely philosophical research.)
Permission for the colony was ultimately granted, and a location was selected at the mouth of the Syne River. The site was developed by diverting the Syne River through a shorter course to the sea. This move was controversial among the existing population, who continued to reminisce about the longer course, referred to since as the Auld Lang Syne.
Meanwhile, the best scientific minds in Scotland were carefully recruited for the project, with scholars representing a variety of disciplines. Dr. Quaintans also hired a small army of support staff to look after his scientists and ensure they would not be distracted by mundane matters.
The colony was only half-way through its first research project–an actuarial analysis of the risk of investment in the Darien scheme–when a prolonged rain upstream caused the site to become inundated by raging floodwaters, resulting in the loss of the colony and all its inhabitants, including Dr. Quaintans. It seems the designers had under-designed the capacity of the new river channel, owing to a mathematical error regarding the quantity of water that the channel would conceivably be required to accommodate.
The full impact of the disaster naturally reverberated through the country, but was missed by most historians. For example, decades after the event, Scottish poet Robert Burns famously asked the question:
Should Alda Quaintans be forgot
And never brought to mind?
Should Alda Quantans be forgot
And Auld Lang Syne?
These lyrics were subsequently misunderstood by historians, linguists, and English audiences and taken completely out of context.
According to Professors Bacchus and McAdam, further research remains to be done to identify other, previously-undetected effects of the disaster on the national literature.
Marseilles, France–Sources close to the household of the Count of Monte Cristo report that the Count was taken to the Marseilles hospital late last night with symptoms resembling either severe gastric distress or a heart attack.
The Count, whose opulent lifestyle caused a splash in Paris society six years ago, recently returned to his native Marseilles for an extended visit following a world tour, ostensibly to pursue his researches into haute cuisine, specifically the croque-monsieur sandwich.
Authorities are exploring the possibility that the Count’s research into the sandwich, a deep-fried ham-and-cheese sandwich with jam and powdered sugar, may have been the cause of this week’s hospital visit. The Count is said to have been on a regular diet of the confection since before his return to France.
“The Count once spoke of having fulfilled his lifelong mission when he left Paris six years ago,” said Dr. Avrigny (retired), a friend of the Morrel family, who are said to be close associates of the Count. “It’s not unusual that a person in such conditions would experience a bit of ennui before finding a new interest in life. And while culinary pursuits can certainly be worthwhile, we seem to have reached the point of obsession–consuming three of these sandwiches a day seems excessive.”
Rumors of the Count’s illness elicited a variety of responses.
Health Minister Lucien Dubray issued a statement warning against over-indulgence in rich foods. “It’s all very well to try to achieve the perfect croque-monsieur,” the statement said, “but one should try to ensure that Monsieur doesn’t croak in the process.”
“To me a heart attack seems unlikely,” said Mme. Danglars, a nurse at the Marseilles hospital and the former wife of one of the Count’s business associates. “You have to have a heart first. Still, it’s hardly a surprise that he’s in ill health; when you eat that kind of food, it’s bound to wreak some kind of vengeance; it’s just a question of when. It would serve him right if he died of it and ended up getting the sandwich named after him.”
Neither the hospital nor the Countess of Monte Cristo has released an official statement on the Count’s prognosis.
La Satira News Service
Police in Manhattan have identified the victim of an accident involving a self-driving car as Lars Gynt, 34, of Oslo, Norway. Mr. Gynt, a computer systems integration consultant, was attempting to cross a street outside a crosswalk when he was struck by the vehicle, which apparently failed to register the presence of a pedestrian.
The human occupant of the vehicle, Nadia Driver of Lower Muttering, Vt., was not injured. Ms. Driver reported that Mr. Gynt had stepped out in front of the car without looking. The car, an electric-powered model, would have been inaudible in the busy street.
Some witnesses have suggested that the car, rather than braking, accelerated slightly as it hurtled toward Mr. Gynt.
The company responsible for developing the car, GGM, has declined to comment pending an investigation into the car’s control software, sensors, and telemetry.
The accident highlights continued concerns over the safety and reliability of self-driving cars in the chaotic road environment. While proponents continue to point out the advantages of computer drivers–faster reaction time, the ability to “see” in multiple directions simultaneously–skeptics often counter with doubts about the computer’s ability to distinguish what it sees or make moral judgments about how to react, as well as the potential for the computer to fall under the malicious control of computer hackers.
In an ironic twist, the hacker category is one that includes Mr. Gynt himself. Records indicate Mr. Gynt, operating under the handle 1G0Tch@10101010, had worked with a number of hacker organizations over the past decade. He was also under investigation by the FBI for his suspected involvement in a previous cyber-attack on control systems developed by GGM.
Rumors that the police are considering the case as one of justifiable homicide by the computer on grounds of self-defense have been flatly denied by police spokespersons.
La Satira News Service
NOVEMBER 8, 2016–Come January, Michael K. “Mickey” Mouse (pronounced “MOWZ”) will have a new job: President of the United States of America.
It’s not a job he campaigned or even asked for. Instead, the 53-year-old plumber from Punxsutawney Springs rode a tidal wave of political discontent and name recognition to rise to the highest office in the land, winning on the strength of millions of voters who, dissatisfied with the choices offered by the major parties, chose to write in the name of Disney’s famous cartoon creation…a name which Mr. Mouse happens to share.
While Mr. Mouse is not the only real person to have a such a name, he is the only one whose practical-joking friends went so far as to submit paperwork at the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to make him a bona fide candidate and therefore eligible to receive credit for any write-in votes with his name on them.
“Any big election will have a few ‘Mickey Mouse’ ballots cast by snarky voters,” said Dr. Adam Jefferson of the University of Punxsutawney’s College of Political Science and Herpetology. “It’s just that this time around, there were so many people fed up with the major candidates–and, for once, there was a candidate legally qualified to receive these particular votes. In terms of the sheer improbability of his manner of arriving at the Presidency, John Tyler and Gerald Ford have nothing on this guy.”
If Mr. Mouse himself is pleased by the prospect of his new career, he is so far being modest about it.
“What do I know about politics?” he wailed upon being informed of his successful candidacy. “I’m a plumber, for crying out loud.”
So far, Mr. Mouse has been assigned a Secret Service detail. He has also been deluged with phone calls and e-mail from well-wishers and others in search of one of the hundreds of diplomatic assignments or other political jobs at his disposal. Almost lost in the shuffle have been several bitter tirades from a few minor party candidates and a series of increasingly desperate call-me-back messages from White House staffers trying to set up situation briefings.
Mr. Mouse’s friends, who filed the initial paperwork on his behalf, were not available for comment, having fled to Canada for reasons of personal safety.
Public opinion about Mr. Mouse’s sudden election has been decidedly mixed. Some members of the public express nervousness about his lack of political experience and potentially insular worldview. Others have expressed enthusiasm for Mr. Mouse based on those same attributes, some adding that his background as a plumber may make him uniquely qualified to drain the cesspool of Washington corruption.
Meanwhile, political analysts and governments around the world are combing through Mr. Mouse’s statements and other records, searching for clues about the direction his presidency is likely to take. The best guess at this point is that Mr. Mouse will push to lower middle-class taxes while increasing spending on urban infrastructure such as water and sewer lines. While Mr. Mouse is a member of a local union–a virtual job requirement in Pennsylvania–he has not been a particularly active one, and his presidency is likely to hold to a middle ground on labor issues. His widely-quoted statement on foreign policy (“How should I know? Let them sort it out by themselves”) suggests a trend toward isolationism.
Still, there may be a broad difference between his stated policy goals (if any) and the actual direction taken by his administration (if any). “In a curious irony, Mr. Mouse in many respects is the ideal candidate for the voter who detests the political insider-ism of one candidate and the wealthy chauvinism of the other,” said the University of Punxsutawney’s Dr. Jefferson. “However, when he gets in office, he may suffer from Ventura’s Syndrome: being elected on his own, without a party to back him up and introduce his legislation, he may have a difficult job actually doing anything.”
The election, of course, is not official until the Electoral College meets and the electoral votes are counted in Congress, but a drastic change is unexpected, thanks to state laws requiring members of the electoral college to vote according to the results of the election.
However, the Electoral College does have one degree of freedom that it can exercise: selecting a Vice President, since Mr. Mouse’s campaign–what there was of it–did not propose a candidate for that office. Some pundits are said to be pushing for the job to be given to one Donald L. Duck, a media research specialist at the University of Pomme de Terre in Idaho, presumably on the basis that his background in the media will help give depth to Mr. Mouse’s policy team.
“I understand both parties are appealing to the FEC to try to get the results overturned,” said Dr. Washington. “It’s a pity–if the parties had done a better job appealing to the electorate as a whole, rather than individual constituencies, maybe we wouldn’t be in this pickle.”
Game May Be Prelude to Invasion, Officials Fear
La Satira News Service
Astatine, NV–Officials at the Center for the Avoidance of Extra-Terestrial Intelligence (CAETI) are mulling the possible connection between the most recent video-game craze and a significant uptick in the number of reported alien abductions.
“In the four or five weeks since this game was released, we’ve seen a thousand percent increase in the number of people coming forward,” said Dr. Elliot Spielberg, director of statistical analysis at CAETI. “Granted, the original numbers were pretty low, so a thousand percent increase doesn’t mean we’re talking about huge numbers yet, but the trend is frankly alarming.”
According to Dr. Spielberg, the abduction reports cover a variety of experiences, ranging from a simple close encounter to vivisection. The alleged victims are returned in generally good health, apart from a tendency toward short-temper, neglect of responsibilities, and obsession with the game. “Of course it’s difficult to tell whether these symptoms are indicative of an actual abduction experience, or merely video game addiction,” Dr. Spielberg admitted.
The game in question, Pachymen Grow, requires players to use their smartphones to travel to different locations in the physical world in search of Pachymen, cartoon-like creatures that can be collected and “grown” to compete in so-called Pachymen Jams. Some areas turn into Pachymen hot-spots, areas were large numbers of Pachymen “hang out” and can be collected by players. The peripatetic nature of the game, while supposedly promoting exercise and social interaction, can also lead players to explore in relative isolation, leaving them vulnerable.
One hot-spot was reported at a former storage facility for Caterpillar heavy equipment. The isolated location continues to be a hot-spot but has waned in popularity since reports surfaced of the temporary abduction of Pachyman players from the site on three occasions. The affected players did not respond to requests for interviews.
Meanwhile, many are left wondering, if a connection does exist, whether the abductions might be a prelude to a more serious action. “Whoever they are, they’re taking a lot of effort to train people to move in the direction of the nearest Pachymen activity,” says Dr. Spielberg. “At some point, all they’ll need to do to harvest a sizeable portion of humanity is to set up massive hot-spots near major population centers and pick ’em off as they come. And we’re still no nearer to knowing who or why.”
CAETI investigators will continue to monitor the situation. The organization recently received a government grant to cover the costs of a number of smartphones which Dr. Spielberg claims will be used by staff for “field research” on the subject.
La Satira News Service
Authorities tonight say they are considering whether they will file charges against several senior citizens who allegedly assaulted participants in a performance of King Lear at the West Punxsutawney Retirement Home.
“Every actor wants their performance to resonate with their audience,” said Margaret de Vere, the artistic director for the Punxsutawney Players, an acting troupe based at the nearby University of Punxsutawney that specializes in bringing theatrical performances to unconventional venues. “Evidently we stumbled onto an undamped sinusoid.”
According to witnesses, the trouble started during the second act, when a small number of audience members began to heckle the actresses playing the parts of Goneril and Regan, the title character’s daughters. As the behavior of Lear’s “daughters” deteriorated, so did the behavior of the crowd, which started throwing bits of food, pill bottles, reading glasses, and even a couple of partials. The unrest continued to spread, and the actors were obliged to exit as the crowd threatened to rush the stage.
“I have no idea what they were thinking, bringing in this sort of subject matter,” said Dr. Elizabeth Woodville, the director of the facility. “While most of our residents are on quite good terms with their families, we’ll thank our visitors for not stoking any embers of inter-generational angst that might be lying around.”
“Somebody really should have seen this coming,” said Richard Gloucester, the local constable who was called in to deal with the situation. “This may not be on par with shouting ‘Fire’ in a crowded theater, but it’s up there.” Constable Gloucester said that the circumstances of the aggressors were being taken into consideration.
The cost of the performance was covered by Shoddi, Smarmy, Rude and Associates, a nearby law firm that specializes in estate management. A spokesman for the firm refused to comment, apart from insisting that the firm’s only interest in underwriting the event was the desire to provide a service to the residents.
Dr. Woodville indicated that the Players will not be invited back for future performances at the home. Any future touring performers will be subject to vetting for suitability by the staff before they are allowed to perform at the home.
“I don’t think they’ll have to worry on our account any further,” said Ms. de Vere, the Punxsutawney Players representative. “I think after this we’ll stick to doing less controversial stuff, like Julius Caesar or Midsummer Night’s Dream. Even Titus Andronicus might be less traumatizing than this has been,” she added.
The un-invitation from the West Punxsutawney Retirement Home is a second set-back for the Punxsutawney Players, after the cancellation of an engagement with the Bandwagon Society‘s annual charity fundraiser event. At last year’s event, the Players presented Shakespeare’s Timon of Athens, in which a wealthy man ruins himself through unwise generosity. The Players were asked not to return after the performance was linked to an 85% drop in pledges and donations.
La Satira News Service
Sources at the Centers for Disease Control have indicated that, contrary to normal practice, resources will be deployed in an attempt to mitigate the effects of the ongoing Iowacoccus plague that has been affecting 10-20 people across the country.
“Normally this wouldn’t be a problem,” said Dr. Germaine Flew of the Office of High-Consequence Pathogens. “Every few years we have a small outbreak, and apart from a few weird symptoms, the cases typically resolve themselves in a few months. However, over the past decade the trend is for the outbreaks to start sooner and resolve later. This is of course worrisome, and we feel it needs further investigation.”
The current outbreak has been active for most of the last two years, though Dr. Flew suggests the contagion may have been active much earlier.
Fortunately, the indications of the disease are not especially severe. The main symptom is usually an irresistible urge to wander around the countryside shaking hands, kissing babies, eating terrible food in a terrible hurry, and making outlandish promises that the victim has no credible means of fulfilling. The disease may also manifest itself as an incipient or fully-developed narcissism.
The Iowacoccus disease has only been observed to be fatal to presidential aspirations.
While many people see CDC involvement as a welcome intervention, questions remain about what can actually be done to help the sufferers. “That’s part of what we need to find out to combat the disease,” admitted Dr. Flew. “There’s some reason to think that a series of lectures on basic economic principles might be helpful, along with a course of demotivational therapy. Until we identify the primary source of the infection, this may be the best we can do for now.”